In her poem Dahabo Musa, a Somali woman, describes
infibulation as “three feminine sorrows, the procedure itself, the wedding
night when the woman has to be cut open, the childbirth when she has to be cut
again”. Infibulation is one of the three different practices which are included
in the definition of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), along with clitoridectomy
and excision which are severe forms of removing, partially or totally, the
external female genitalia.
Though FGM seems to be an issue far from our imagination, it
requires a lot of attention considering that is currently practiced in the five
continents, regardless of religion and the law. Numbers speak: 140 million
women in the world have undergone Female Genital Mutilation. 3 millions of
girls from early infants to 15 years old are at risk every year. FGM is a
cultural practice in more than 50 countries between Africa and South Asia. Many
anthropological studies refer to it as an old practice, having traces from
ancient Egypt to the Roman Empire. Perhaps unknown to many, in more recent
times, in the 19th century, FGM was performed in the United States as well as
in some European countries to treat lesbianism, masturbation and hysteria.
In 2014 it is necessary to set FGM in a new context, as it
is not just performed in the countries where it was born. Immigration, in fact,
has contributed in spreading the practice all over the world enlarging the
geographic impact of FGM. The main reason of this is that communities which
have established themselves in a new country where laws punish whoever follows
the practice seek to maintain bonds with their homeland. FGM is seen as a
significant mark in man-woman relationships. Often women who have not undergone
the cut are outcast and unmarriageable in their own communities.
Based on inequality between the sexes, it is one of the
extreme forms of discrimination against women. FGM is internationally
recognised as a violation of the human rights of girls and women as it violates
their right to health, security and physically integrity. In some countries
like Djibouti and Somalia where 98 per cent of women are still cut, there’s
also a high percentage of mortality among women and girls.
The inhuman and degrading process which a mutilated woman
undergoes requires world-wide attention: promoting awareness in schools as well
as in other fields of the social life to help raise of a public dialogue. The
stigma women have on them is unspeakable, let alone the physical and psychological
stress they have to live with on a daily basis.
Changing a social convention needs time and the commitment
of all the social parts of the community, involving three important basics:
information, education and confrontation. Immigrants are called to play a
significant role as mediators between the old and the new, between the custom
and human rights.
I came across Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) many years ago
in Kenya, but in recent times I have had the chance to focus on the issue while
working with a collective of women in Cape Town, South Africa, in a workshop
based on “telling spaces through narrative and exploring one’s impact in
society in terms of human rights sensitiveness”. Some of the women who
participated in the workshop were migrants from other African countries and had
experienced Female Genital Mutilation in their life. These were women who have
been taught to suffer in silence, to avoid the shame that the community would
throw at them if showing signs of opposition. Working with them was such a
rewarding and humbling experience, especially because, by attending the
workshop, they soon became conscious of the power of imagination and art as a
media through which to share their sense of loss due to the cut. Theatre,
writing, dance, poetry have provided a strong sense of awareness that has led
them to a choice that is also a statement: fighting FGM in their own
communities by embracing the idea that, as violence is cultural, it is through
culture that it has to come to an end. In the words of Amina, one of the women
of the group: “I carried my wound secretly uploading the custom as a pride to
wear on my bleeding scar/ but time has provided me with the right words / I
hold this pen to fix the wound and raise the change I made for my daughter to
be/I sewed the cut with the thread of words and the seed of knowledge.”
At the beginning of this year, film director and producer
Andreas Frowein, a professor at Kampala University, stumbled upon my work and
that’s how I met Kenyan filmmaker and activist Beryl Magoko, producer of ‘The
Cut’, a documentary on Female Genital Mutilation shot in her home vil-lage in
Kuria, Kenya. The Kuria people, in Kenya and Tanzania, are still practicing FGM
as a ritual. Even though is officially banned in Kenya since October 2011, FGM
is highly practiced among different ethnic groups who put pressure on the
girls, who fear to find no husband if not cut.
The merit of this documentary is the attention given to
perspectives. All the members of the community in the village were asked their
opinion on FGM; no one was left voiceless: women, girls who are not yet cut,
girls who are already circumcised, circumcisers, men, doctors, teachers.
Pro-moting a new sense of awareness, available to all, that there’s another
possible future for many girls, who today still can be potential victims of
FGM, is an undeniable merit of this film.
Presenting her documentary in different countries, Magoko
achieved im-portant recognition: “Best Feature Film” at London Feminist Film
Festival, “Best Documentary” at Great Rift Valley Film Festival, “Best East
African Film” at Kenya International Film Festival, “Best Documentary” at Reel
Sisters of the Diaspora Film Festival. Born in Komotobo, Kuria, Kenya, Ma-goko
studied Graphic Design at Mombasa Polytechnic and later attended a
Film-TV-Production course at Kampala University in Uganda. She is cur-rently
working on two new films, both representing difficult situations that Africa
women confront. Here’s our conversation.
VALENTINA ACAVA MMAKA: Beryl, you produced ‘The Cut’ as a
film fo a diploma course while attending Kampala University in Uganda. What
moved you to choose such a delicate theme like Female Genital Mutilation, a
part from being yourself a victim of this practice?
BERYL MAGOKO – First, I don’t like to be referred to as a
victim. The Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) topic has been in my mind since
childhood. In early 1995, a certain NGO came to our school to teach us about
the effects of FGM. That was when I knew it wasn’t good. For me that was a few
moths too late. I thought someday I would tell the story to inform/ educate my
people. Nevertheless, I didn’t know how to do that at that time. After my
secondary education, I studied graphic design, but it could not help much in
telling the story. When later I was studying Mass Communication from November
2007 on, I thought of writing a newspaper article, but that was not going to
reach my target audience. In 2009, film was introduced in our university. I
didn’t hesitate to register for the course. I knew if I had a chance to make
film my medium.
VALENTINA ACAVA MMAKA – The documentary is set among the
Kuria people, who still practice FGM, a community to which you belong. How did
being circumcised effect you as a person when you moved out of your community
to study and meet other women? How did this practice effect you as a girl and
as a woman?
BERYL MAGOKO – This is a difficult question. The good thing
is the by physical appearance you can’t distinguish between a circumcised girl
and one who is not unless she tells you. There is no discrimination and I
hardly talked about it, (unless I was with some people that had gone through
that and they asked me. But that was so rare). Most people don’t want to
discuss it for reasons known to them. It didn’t affect me. Once you know the
truth, you have to find a way to deal with it. And going to different
communities just widened my horizon. I found that not all women have undergone
FGM. Once I found out that it serves no purpose, I was not happy and I
regretted having gone through FGM. At the end of the day I had to accept and
learn how to live with it .
VALENTINA ACAVA MMAKA – What was the position of your family
regarding FGM and how did they receive your work?
BERYL MAGOKO – During research my mother and my sister told
me to choose another topic (since the subject was more complex than
circumcision itself). They were worried of my well-being. After explaining to
them that I wanted the project, they supported me. I remember my mother wanted
to be part of the research if other women refused to talk to me! During
shooting, I underwent many challenges, but my family was there for me. They
were and have been so supportive.
VALENTINA ACAVA MMAKA – The film is rich by the fact that it
includes all the people concerned with this practice: girls, circumcised and
uncircumcised, circumcisers, men, women, activists, doctors, bringing different
perspectives. Working in your homeland among your people did it prevent you
from having difficulties? Did you encounter some obstacles while working?
BERYL MAGOKO – Yes, it was not as easy as I had thought. I
had thought that working in my home area I could do research within a few days,
but that was not the case. It took me five weeks. In the beginning, it was
difficult for me to get people who are willing to talk about the practice since
it is a taboo. Some people thought that I was investigating and feared that I
would tell the police so that they will be arrested. The hardest part of all
was to get girls who were circumcised and were willing to talk about it. For
many girls who underwent FGM that is not easy. Many would tell me that they
didn’t go through it, although they did. But I understood. During shooting,
there was harassment, but I endured it.
VALENTINA ACAVA MMAKA – Watching the documentary there’s a
number of girls who refuse to undergo FGM. What is their role within a
community so traditionally linked to this practice? How will they be able to
find a way to effectively reject the practice against their families or
community?
BERYL MAGOKO – They are the role models to other young girls
who are growing up. But without telling others that they didn’t go through FGM
how will they know? They can achieve that through motivation, information and
encouragement from activists, the church and from teachers. However much
pressure they face, they should be strong and learn to say ‘No’ to FGM, no
matter the circumstance they are going through. I know this is difficult but
wherever there is a will there is a way.
VALENTINA ACAVA MMAKA: It’s interesting that young men stand
by women’s rights, not wanting their girlfriends and wives cut. What is the
percentage?
BERYL MAGOKO: I can’t really tell the percentage. All I know
is Kuria men marry women from other tribes who are not circumcised and nowadays
some marry Kuria ladies who are not circumcised, but they are few…
VALENTINA ACAVA MMAKA: A woman who has undergone FGM is
often a woman who feels a sense of loss, physically and psychologically,
especially when it comes to confronting herself in a context different from
hers. What made you aware that FGM is a wrong thing and what drove you to
embrace the cause of fighting it?
BERYL MAGOKO – It was in 1995 when an NGO came to our school
telling us the effects of FGM using some pictures. Then I realized that it was
not good. Most girls go through it unwillingly, just because they do what the
parents say, and many don’t even know that these effects are there. I just want
to find a way of giving the necessary information to the community.
VALENTINA ACAVA MMAKA: Numbers speaks alone: 140 million
women in the world are victims of FGM regardless of religion and geography. One
of the consistent facts is that FGM is widely practiced in the diaspora among
the migrant communities who often practice it against the law in a very hidden
way. How do you think a documentary like yours can affect the diaspora
communities in Europe, USA, Australia for example, in perceiving a different
vision about it and in thinking about a possible change for the future
generations?
BERYL MAGOKO: I hope that many people will see the film and
learn what it really does to the girls. A big number of men do not really know
what happens and many women do not know enough about the consequences.
Therefore, I hope that ‘The Cut’ can give them more information to understand
that FGM is a human rights violation that should end as soon as possible. I
also hope that those who have understood this will be courageous enough to talk
to their relatives back home.
VALENTINA ACAVA MMAKA: Even though in countries like Kenya
FGM is illegal, laws are still not working to defeat the practice. What do
local communities and migrants need to do to eradicate FGM?
BERYL MAGOKO: What the communities need is education, more
education and information about the practice. Also, the activists should not
concentrate in one region only; rather they should spread and even reach the
minority in other communities. Don’t get me wrong, I am not against the law.
But to me arresting one couple who have circumcised their daughter and leaving
hundreds walk free isn’t going to solve the problem. Give the people
information that they need; if they don’t follow then the law breakers
concerned can be arrested.
VALENTINA ACAVA MMAKA: What was the response from the
audience where your documentary was screened? Did you notice a different
reception in Africa and in Europe? If yes, how? Did you have the chance to
confront directly with women in the audience who have been cut? What have you
been told so far about your work?
BERYL MAGOKO: The reception of the film was good – in most
places. In Kenya a big number of people who have watched don’t understand why
FGM is taking place when there is a law against it. Well, in Ouagadougou I saw
men cry (it was touching for me). Some of those men came from regions where
women are circumcised. In Europe more people attend the screenings; some have
little idea what is all about FGM and others are already rather well informed
about the topic. I can’t say ‘confront’ rather I met a few women who approached
me for a quick chat. During the screening in Frankfurt, a woman from Egypt told
me she went through it at a tender age, she realized later in life that she was
circumcised, and she had to confront her parents (it took long for her to
forgive them). When she saw the film she imagined what she underwent. Another
lady from Brussels went through it at the age of seven and she was so emotional
from the beginning of the film to the end. She told me her story too. In West
Africa, a lady from Middle East didn’t want to watch the film because it was
‘hard’ for her.
Some women who have gone through it don’t want to watch the
film because it brings back the memory that somebody is trying to ‘bury’… A big
number of the people like my work. But one woman from Germany attacked me badly
– although she has never watched the film – saying that I should have protected
the girls by calling the government to intervene… She didn’t know what she was
talking about, because the government representatives who work in Kuria are
aware of the practice and some are invited to attend the ceremony and others
stand on the way to watch! She not only attacked me but also other NGOs in
German that fight FGM. Also one man from Kenya tried to urge me to shoot
another film and show how important circumcision is.
VALENTINA ACAVA MMAKA: Sometimes when interviewing old men
they speak on a defensive tone, pretending that it is the women who want FGM
and not them imposing it. How would you describe this behaviour? Do you think
it is a hidden sign of recognition from the elders that FGM is a wrong thing?
BERYLMAGOKO: When you ask men about FGM most of them say
that it is the women who want it. To me this is not true. For instance in Kuria
women don’t give orders. So men influence; they usually tell their wives that
their daughters should be circumcised. Some few don’t tell the girls directly,
they want the mothers to tell the girls. If mothers say no, sometimes men
become violent and the mother and the girl have to accept FGM just for the sake
of peace! In addition there are some cases of men marrying ladies who are not
circumcised. Then they torture the ladies physically and psychological until
they have no choice but to undergo FGM. This doesn’t happen in Kuria only but
in other communities too. All in all, there is a lot of pressure from parents,
neighbours and peers. To the elders that is their culture and it is a
compulsory. Some of them know that some day it will end, but they don’t want to
end it. Nevertheless some educated people don’t circumcise their daughters
anymore.
VALENTINA ACAVA MMAKA: Recently Aminata Taouré, a politician
writer and feminist from Mali said that while she is against FGM, she refuses
that the Northern (read “western”) countries show African women how to fights
this plague. What do you think about this? Is it possible to eradicate FGM
without confronting the “otherness” and in which way do you think it is
possible to build a public dialogue on FGM breaking?
BERYL MAGOKO: There are few African women who are fighting
against the practice. I think we need the Westerners for support. They should
be in the background to hold us while the African women should be in the
frontline because it is much easier for them to confront the supporters. In my
view we need help. No, it is not possible to eradicate FGM without
confrontation. We have to initiate dialogues with the girls, parents and the
elders who organize circumcision, so that we make them understand that
circumcision has no purpose and what the effects are. We need to convince them
to stop FGM and find an alternative for this rite of passage rite – but force
will not work.
Author Valentina Acava Mmaka
Article Courtesy of Pambazuka
No comments:
Post a Comment